Brett Favre Overdose

This whole Brett Favre situation has really taken a turn for the worse it seems. What’s most troubling is both sides are essentially talking about same elements that have occurred, with each interrupting the events in their own way. Both sides have valid points and I have no idea how this will get solved.

Those reporting in the media seem to be on board with Rodgers deserves chance since Favre retired. Hard to disagree there. Brett backers can’t get enough of this long time warrior and would support him if he threw a 100 interceptions (receivers just ran wrong routes, wink).

O.K. seeing I’m main writer for this blog, I should have opinion and do, though it’s different from what I wrote a week ago. Still being a Packers season ticket holder (Milwaukee version), I initially supported management, knowing I was a Green Bay fan before #4 and will be one after he leaves. I do feel for Aaron Rodgers, this does stink after all this time, but last I looked, life is like Forrest Gump said.

As a fan, I want the team I root for to have the best chance to win possible, period. If this situation comes to complete impasse, coach Mike McCarthy declares quarterback position open. That’s right, Fav-re quit, team needed commitment he could not deliver, gave his best answer at the time. Packers went with Rodgers, who is best available quarterback on the roster. Rodgers feels he deserves to be starter, Favre believes he’s proven (rightfully) he shouldn’t be backup. Have open competition in camp and let the best player earn the job. As a true competitor, both would be asked to perform at their best. While Rodgers might feel the situation is weighted against him, too damn bad. If you are truly the right QB for what ended up being the second best team in the NFC, show your worth.

Having previously lived in the state of the frozen tundra for many years, winning with Favre would be great, but winning with Rodgers will work also.

Though never really a huge fan of Billy Packer, was surprised he was either leaving or being shown the door. Listening to Packer describe games was generally a pleasure with his no-nonsense basketball-first style. His often aloof approach to the selection committee, the changes in the college game, left him seeming out of touch in the new millennium. His personal views about life and politics only alienated people, thus why would he bother other than to be heard.

In all honesty, thought Packer was better than he had been in years this past season. He was more into games, talked more frankly about players and situations. In different telecasts he observed O.J. Mayo and Eric Gordon were good, not great college players. He mentioned he understood, both would likely go in the NBA draft after the season, but were far from polished products. He talked about how dull the Big Ten tournament was, lacking top level players compared to other conferences. His remarks about North Carolina being done in the national Final Four game were priceless, as Jim Nantz and every CBS executive’s jaw fell to the floor based on his appraisal so early in the contest, of which the network is shelling out a 1, with a whole bunch of zeroes behind it to broadcast.

Thanks Billy, it’s been fun, as we move into the world of Clark Kellogg and “taking the orange to the tin” or “he’s got a lot in his bookbag”.

No comments: