Showing posts with label college football betting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college football betting. Show all posts

Big 12 Preview

b>2010 BIG 12 CONFERENCE FOOTBALL PREVIEW

By Marc Lawrence of Playbook.com

They gained notoriety as the ‘Sure We Cheat’ (SWC) league in the 1970’s. They then evolved into the Big 8 Conference before expanding into the Big 12. Where they go from here, no one knows.

What we know for sure is the Big 12 Conference is back for another college football season in 2010. And we can also likely expect another lackluster performance from this loop come bowl time.

Granted, Texas made it to the BCS championship game last year, a game in which Oklahoma has made four appearances this past decade. But the truth of the matter is unless the Big12 can improve on its blasé 39-38 SU and 32-45 ATS mark in bowl games since 2000, they will likely go down as another also-ran major conference that continues to shoot itself in the foot thanks to lackluster play on the defensive side of the ball.

In closing, despite the defensive deficiencies of the rest of the conference, beware of the Sooners. Other than the game with Texas, they figure to be double-digit favorites in every other contest this season. Remember, the last time Bob Stoops lost five games in the same season his team went on to go 13-0 and win a national championship (2000).

Note: Team writeups excerpted from the 2010 PLAYBOOK Football Preview magazine. Numbers following team name represent the amount of returning starters on offense and defense, with an asterisk (*) designating a returning quarterback. Designated ‘Play On’ and ‘Play Against’ Best Bets follow each team’s preview.

North Division

COLORADO – *9 / 7


TEAM THEME: ROCKY MOUNTAIN LOW

When a coach goes just 10-22 in league play and his team finishes LAST in total conference offense two years running, one would figure a coaching change is in order. Not in Boulder. The Buffaloes rehired Dan Hawkins because they could not afford the cost of a buyout and a rehire. Talk about a sign of the times! The only team in the Big 12 not to use a spread offense, Colorado will turn to an offensive line that returns all five starters. A soft seven-game home schedule, only four true road games, revenge aplenty and an over-abundance of playing time for true freshman over the last three seasons, could actually find the Buffaloes roaming in a minor bowl. If not, the only sign you may see around the Boulder area is one that says ‘For Sale’ – no matter what the cost.
PLAY AGAINST: vs. Kansas (11/6)

IOWA STATE – *8 / 5

TEAM THEME: PEEPING PAUL

When newly-hired HC Paul Rhoads first met with the team, he told them that they were going to win a bowl game in 2009. Did Paul see something nobody else did? After all, the Cyclones had gone 2-10 in 2008 and had not won a bowl game since 2004. Despite an offense that ranked last in the Big 12 in 2009, Rhoads was true to his word as an Insight Bowl victory over Minnesota capped off a surprising 7-6 season. The offensive numbers should improve in 2010 as eight starters return to Ames, including QB Austen Arnuad. Defensively, only five starters are back in the mix but the linebacking unit – the strength of the defense – returns three starters including tackling machine, Jesse Smith. Here’s some scholarly advice for Rhoads: with nine winning teams and eight bowlers on the docket, we suggest you take a long look at the schedule before making any promises.
PLAY AGAINST: vs. Nebraska (11/6)

KANSAS – 8 / 7

TEAM THEME: WEIGHT AND SEE

After a mistreatment allegation, the big man has left the campus as Mark Mangino’s eight-year stint in Lawrence comes to an abrupt end. New HC Turner Gill knows he’ll have some big pants to fill and the former Nebraska star will bring along some heavy-hitting coordinators in Chuck Long and Carl Torbush. Star QB Todd Reesing and his 11,194 total yards and 90 TD’s have also departed. Not to worry. Gill turned a dormant Buffalo program into a conference champion in three years. Imagine what he could do with a team that has won 25 games over the past three seasons and returns 15 starters, including an entire offensive line. We realize the Big 12 is a large leap from the MAC but we also recall that Gill is a perfect 20-0 versus the conference in his playing days as a star QB. Been there – done that!
PASS

KANSAS STATE – 5 / 7

TEAM THEME: PHASE TWO, YEAR TWO

Kansas State’s silver-haired HC Bill Snyder proved age is only a number when he guided the 2009 Wildcats to bowl-eligible status. After a 3-year hiatus, the 70-year old Snyder returned to the Manhattan sidelines and looked to shore up a defense that was scorched for over 36 PPG, 479 YPG and 5.2 YPC the previous season. And shore up he did. The ‘Cats held seven opponents to under 20 points as the defense improved by 13 PPG and an incredible 139 YPG while allowing just 3.5 YPC. The combination of a now well-fortified defense (seven returning starters), a top-notch RB in Daniel Thomas (the Big 12 newcomer of the year) and a favorable early schedule (first true road game not until mid-October) holds promise for 2010. Old habits never die.
PLAY ON: vs. Oklahoma St (10/30)

MISSOURI – *8 / 8

TEAM THEME: CAT SCRATCH FEVER

Expect a big year from Missouri in 2010. Many believe that following their breakout season in 2007 (12-2), Gary Pinkel recruited a slew of talent – and that investment is about to pay some dividends. Not only do the Tigers return eight starters on each side of the ball, but 30 of the 44 players on the season-ending two-deep roster were either freshmen or sophomores – the second most in the nation last year. A season opening five-game schedule that includes three home games against FBS foes with a combined 8-28 record, a fourth home game against McNeese State and a neutral site match-up with 3-9 Illinois, should help these Tigers catch their tail early. If the Cats are going to have the year we think they’ll have, a 5-0 start is critical with only two of the season’s final seven games at home, including trips to Lincoln and Lubbock. Nonetheless, we’ll take the bait.
PLAY ON: vs. Nebraska (10/30)

NEBRASKA – *10 / 7

TEAM THEME: TWO YEARS GONE BY

Have the Huskers turned the corner? Bearing in mind they ranked No. 116 in scoring defense in 2007 (37.9 PPG) – the year before HC Bo Pelini arrived – and No. 1 last season (10.4 PPG), the answer is a resounding yes. Also consider they were 1-20 SU versus Top 20 ranked teams before a promising 3-2 showing last season. The former NFL assistant also has the Kids of the Corn playing their best ball late in the season, posting a stout 9-2 record from November out, including 7-1 in November alone (Bill’s Callahan’s previous 4-year regime only won a total of six November contests). 17 returning starters, with every ball carrier back in the mix and a favorable schedule that includes Texas at home and is sans Oklahoma, makes Nebraska worthy of a BCS futures play. Is that Springsteen’s ‘Glory Days’ we hear playing in those Lincoln cornfields?
PLAY AGAINST: vs. Colorado (11/26)

South Division

BAYLOR – *7 / 5


TEAM THEME: LET’S GET PHYSICAL

Perhaps no team in the land figures to benefit more from the return of a key player from injury than Baylor, as star QB Robert Griffin III re-claims his starting spot after tearing an ACL in Game Three last season. After a promising 2-1 start, the Bears went into hibernation (2-7) when Griffin went down to stay. HC Art Briles, however, has more than the return of his star on his mind as he looks to address a defense that allowed over 400 YPG in 2009. After the spring game, Briles noted, “Those guys are strong, fast, mean and tough… that’s what they need to be. They need to be aggressive and physical with a bad temper. That’s what we have to get to and that’s the way we have to play, because in the Big 12 South if you’re friendly and nice, you’re going to have a long season.” If RG3 can stay healthy and Briles can impose his will, these Bears will be anything but average.
PASS

OKLAHOMA – *10 / 6

TEAM THEME: KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES

Despite losing three players in the first four picks of this year’s NFL draft – including Heisman trophy winner and all-time NCAA passing efficiency leader Sam Bradford – 23 full or part-time starters return. Included is SO QB Landry Jones, who led the nation’s freshman QBs in passing yards (3,198) and TD passes (26) last season. His yardage figure was also an OU record, breaking the mark set by Bradford in 2007. Expect Jones to surpass those numbers this season as all-everything RB DeMarco Murray and record-setting WR Ryan Broyles stay onboard the Sooner Schooner in 2010. Whether by land or air, the OU attack shouldn’t miss a beat as Jones and company figure to keep up with the Bradfords. Remember, OU faced the 2nd toughest schedule in the land in 2009 and four of its five losses were by a total of 12 points.
PLAY ON: vs. Texas Tech (11/13)

OKLAHOMA STATE – 6 / 4

TEAM THEME: “O”, NO

It’s not often a 9-win season is considered a bummer. That may have been the case in Stillwater last season, though, when the Cowboys were shut out in their season finale at rival Oklahoma and then held to seven points in a bowl loss to Ole Miss. When the dust settled, a highly-touted, veteran offense saw their production fall 13 points and 120 YPG as injuries, player suspensions and being a ‘marked team’ finally took its toll. The ‘D’ was actually a bright spot last year but with only four starters back in the mix, HC Mike Gundy realizes he may have to win a few shootouts. Enter OC Dana Holgorsen. He brings his playbook from Houston where his offense was tops in the nation last season. Star RB Kendall Hunter is back to tote the pigskin but untested 26-year old JR QB Brandon Weeden takes over for Zac Robinson. It’s time to man up, ‘Boys!
PASS

TEXAS – 6 / 7

TEAM THEME: BIG (12) BULLIES

The Horns were a shoulder-injury short of winning a national championship last season. When QB Colt McCoy went down in the BCS title game, so did Texas’ hopes of beating Alabama. McCoy is off to the NFL and in steps Garrett Gilbert to direct an attack that will be moving away from the spread offense to more of a running game in 2010. This move will take some pressure off Gilbert, the 2008 High School Player of the Year, and hopefully improve a ground game that averaged a mere 148 YPG – their worst since 2002. No such adjustments are needed on the defensive front where the UT rush defense held opponents to a nation-low 72 YPG on the ground. Eight bowlers do roam this year’s schedule but six of those come from the Big 12 where the Horns are 16-1 SU over the last two seasons. The first two games in October will likely decide their fate.
PLAY AGAINST: as favorite vs. Texas Tech (9/18)

TEXAS A&M – *6 / 9

TEAM THEME: WHO STOPS J.J.?

The Jerrod Johnson show returns to College Station for its final season and it may draw a bigger audience in these parts than ‘Who shot J.R.?’ Johnson, a second-team all Big 12 performer, keyed the 5th best offense in the land by throwing for a school record 3,217 yards and 28 TD’s while adding another 455 yards on the ground. He saved his best performance for Texas, throwing for 342 yards and rushing for 97 more. J.J. is joined by a cast of kids that formed the youngest roster in the nation last year. While the offense will take the lead role, it’s imperative for the defense to add some support. Mike Sherman will rely on new DC Tim DeRuyter to shore up a stop unit that ranked 105th in the nation. DeRuyter, who led Air Force to a No. 11 team defense ranking last season, will have eight starters to work with as he incorporates his 3-4 scheme. With a season-ender at Texas, the finale should be scintillating.
PASS

TEXAS TECH – *8 / 6

TEAM THEME: JAMES GANG

With Craig and Adam James’ approval, Tommy Tuberville steps in to take over for Mike Leach, in one of the major coaching moves in Division 1 this season. After getting unceremoniously dumped by Auburn, Tuberville now walks into the Lubbock fire. Leach won 84 games in his 10 seasons with Tech – and along with Texas and Oklahoma, formed the winningest trio of teams in the nation from the same conference over the last three seasons (276 victories). Tuberville welcomes back 14 returning starters, including QB Taylor Potts. The word, though, is the QB job is open between Taylor and fan favorite Steven Sheffield (rumor has it that whoever completes more passes to Adam in the spring will likely get the nod). Whomever Tuberville decides on, he better make sure of one thing: he leads the Raiders to a bowl – ‘cause the fans sure got used to it with Leach.
PLAY ON: vs. Houston (11/27) – *KEY as dog

Answers to College Football Questions

While perusing a variety of forums, one common theme found is people have questions and can’t always get the answers they are looking for. This spawned an idea that possibly a number of people have the same or similar questions and we could answer them effectively and efficiently. Let’s not mess around and get to them.

Is it a good idea to bet on heavy college football favorites?

To properly answer this question, it must be determined what a heavy favorite is. For the sake of simplicity, we’ll say favorites of 10 or more points are the dividing line. The standard deviation for home field advantage is 3.7 to 3.8 depending on the year and encompassing all 120 FBS universities. That would mean any home team is roughly six points better than their opposition if playing at home and favored by 10 points. If a team is 10-point road favorite, they would 14 points better (14-4=10) on a neutral field.

Betting large favorites is purely a losing proposition in looking at all games that fit criteria.

ATS Record
2009 - 90-92, 49.4 percent
2008 – 97-103, 48 percent
2007 – 107-122, 46.7 percent
2006 – 115-125, 47.9 percent

This does not include the vig on each wager lost. It’s clearly not a huge losing proposition, but certainly not a good one. Playing these teams as underdog’s is not a good a great wager either (51.9 percent). It’s best to be selective and keep detailed records over a period of time to find out if you have a particular skill in uncovering what side you should be on in games with larger spreads.

Is it better to play sides or totals in college football?

Without a doubt, totals is the way to go, but only if you spend the time to study and know your numbers. Most people bet sides, which the oddsmakers are completely understand. They will always post the sides first, since this leads to immediate action and they can start making a dollar for every 11/10 wager on losers’ vs winners. After the sides have been processed, the totals will typically be released a day later. Because the focus is on the meat and potatoes product (sides), totals releases will often have money limits on bets, since sharps are like circling vultures, looking to pound bad numbers. An indication of what I mean is found in two places. Early line moves on college totals this season (three points or more by Wednesday morning) are 36-21, 63.1 percent and totals that end three or points different than starting number are jaw-dropping 97-50, 65.9 percent.

I’m an old school bettor, does betting on teams that have covered or failed to cover three in a row still hold up?

For probably more than a decade, this was a safe and convenient play for the bettor that needed a quick fix. A team that had covered the spread three consecutive times was set for downfall and was a solid Play Against team in the 54-60 percent range. Teams that had failed to cover for three consecutive games were a quality bet ranging from 55 to 63 percent. These days, not so much. (Numbers based on three continuous games, no bye weeks)

3ATS Wins
2008 24-25
2007 21-22
2006 30-27
2005 34-32

3ATS Losses
2008 21-28
2007 26-25
2006 16-33
2005 29-28

The one angle that has offered the most hope is playing against teams failing to cover a trio of oddsmakers numbers. Thus far in 2009, three-time spread winners are 12-11 ATS and three-time losers are 14-9 ATS in next encounter.

All my buddies tell me they win at parlays, but everything I read says to stay away from them. Should I be playing three-team parlays and what are my chances of winning?
The basic reason one would make a parlay wager is obvious, the payout is higher than a straight bet, and parlays offer the potential for a big payoff from a smaller wager.

Typical payoffs for winning parlays are as follows:


# of games --Payout


2--13 to 5


3--6 to 1


4 --10 to 1


5 --20 to 1


Using these numbers, making three straight bets of $110 each would pay $300 profit if all three games won. With a three team parlay, one wager of $100 and winning all three games would show a profit of $600. Sounds great but here is the sticky part.

A point spread is intended to make any contest a 50-50 proposition. The true odds of winning a three-team parlay against the point spread are 7-1. As shown above, the value derived of winning is 6-1, which any wagering analyst or professional sports bettor would explain are poor odds in one’s favor.

The other negative is you could win two of three bets in the parlay wager and lose $100, as compared to showing a profit of $90 by make three straight wagers at 11/10 and winning twice.

It’s a foregone conclusion the team that wins the turnover battle wins the game most of the time. How does anyone predict who will win the turnovers in order to make money betting?

If it were only that simple. Start with the idea at this juncture of the season, teams that commit a lot of turnovers will probably continue to do so and teams that take care of the ball likely will. The largest deviation from year to year in turnovers is fumbles. A fumble is a random event, once the ball is on the ground, it’s roughly 50-50 what team will fall on it. Much like in baseball winning one run games, fumbles are cyclical events. Some teams are better at forcing them through training and technique; however that doesn’t mean they will land on them every time. From year to year, sometimes you get the breaks and other times you don’t.

One aspect that has the potential to profit from is those teams that commit five or more turnovers and what they do against the spread in the next game. In the last three years including this season, these squads are 73-52 ATS, 58.4 percent. This makes sense as coaches emphasize the importance of ball security after a turnover prone game and the squad comes through a winner.

How do I win betting college football?

Start with the old joke, the quickest way to have $1,000 dollars betting on sports is starting with $2,000. But seriously, each person needs to find their own method. Analytical handicapping is the most full proof in my opinion, as you are dealing with facts. At this point of the season, there is ample information to study from. Knowing how teams do running and passing the ball as well as stopping both tells a compelling story. Within this area is other information to understand.

A team might average 400 yards total offense, yet the opponents they have faced might allow 395 yards per game, which leads to the conclusion this is ordinary offensive team that could struggle against very good defensive club. This creates opportunity to play against such a team.

Situational handicapping is crucial to understand. UTEP is probably the best example of 2009. The Miners have played at home as underdogs versus Houston and Tulsa right after they faced big emotional contests at home. Each team lacked the spark needed to play against hungry opponent and lost outright to UTEP. The Miners were also caught in the same dilemma. After upsetting the Cougars, they went on the road to Memphis, TN as 1.5-point favorites and were drilled by less than menacing Memphis Tigers 35-20.

A number of wise sports bettors place little or no value in trends. I would say it is not a large component to consider, but in college football there are a number of peculiar angles that win year after year and have to be in the mix of information.

Being analytical and using situational handicapping builds winners.